Brits “almost succeed” in blaming Iraq sabotage on mechanical failure
Tue, 27 July 2004
ENERGY PIPELINE News reports that British sources initially managed to convince the Associated Press that failure of Iraq’s 42-in crude line on 3 July was due to mechanical causes, and that there was no suspicion of sabotage.
The cause of the breach was unknown, but there was no suggestion it was sabotage, a spokesman told AP, and exports were unaffected, the spokesman said.
Reuters quickly corrected the account, posting a story saying a sabotage attack on the 42-in mainline in southern Iraq had cut the country’s southern exports to 960,000brl/d. Iraq had been exporting around 1.8 million brl/d from two offshore Gulf terminals before the weekend sabotage. The attacks on the 42-in pipeline stopped operations at the Khor al-Amaya terminal and cut the export flow rate at the Basra terminal, formerly known as Mina al-Bakr, to 40,000 barrels per hour compared to up to 70,000 before the attack. The unaffected 48-in southern mainline continued to operate.
On 4 July, saboteurs attacked the oil pipeline linking Iraq’s northern and southern oil fields. Columns of smoke were rising hundreds of feet in the air from a section of the strategic pipeline near the Hawijat al-Fallujah area southwest of Baghdad. Service on the sabotaged 42-in southern pipeline resumed on 7 July following repairs and testing.